The dress, was the work of Los Angeles-based Argentinian designer Franc Fernandez, has sparked outrage from animal rights activists who believe this is very much in bad taste. Gaga defended herself by saying she wore the dress to make a protest that women in the music industry are treated like pieces of meat.
"If we don't stand up for what we believe in and don't stand up for our rights pretty soon we're going to have as much rights as the meat on our bones." The controversy comes just after Gaga posed on the front cover of Japanese Vogue in a bikini also apparently made from raw meat.
Was Gaga attention seeking again and trying to make headlines with another crazy outfit? Has she pushed it too far this time?
to make a protest that women in the music industry are treated like pieces of meat = yeah right. she just wanted headlines really. not believing in this argument one minute.
ReplyDeleteI'm not quite sure what my stance is on this. I don't eat meat and haven't done for 5 or so years, although I'm not the type of person to force my views on other people and I'll happily sit next to someone eating a burger and it won't bother me. I think if she wore fur instead of raw meat she would of caused a lot more controversy and then I'd definately call it distasteful! Hmm it's a hard one xx
ReplyDeleteooooh bet it was pretty stinky by the end of the night haha xxx
ReplyDeletewww.fashionbirdcage.blogspot.com